Comments for Part I: One Man's Trash Is Another Man's Treasure - MedClean Technologies (OTC:MCLN) at http://www.biomedreports.com , comment 1 to 39 out of 20 comments http://www.biomedreports.com Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:38:35 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1776 I created a blog to piece together all of the pertinent information regarding this gold mine. If interested, please click on [url]http://medcleantechnologies.blogspot.com/[/url] All the best - JonMK Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:41:36 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1637 Form 4 just filed. Manatuck Hill Partners exercized warrants for 30 mil shares at almost no cost and sold them plus another 30 mil or so. They still have about 100 mil but the prices they sold doesnt instill much confidence; price ranged from .0419 to .0266 on dates 11/30 to today. - robert campi Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:23:49 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1631 I agree wholeheartedly with REB's analysis and critique of biomed. I hope you make some changes which inspire subscriber confidence. Otherwise, what goes around, comes around. It seems appropriate to publish all comments rather than screening them. That would also inspire more confidence in your readers and act as a self-editing mechanism to keep the comments to the point and appropriate. - David Bauman Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:11:49 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1629 Where is Part 2 to this article, I'm really interested in seeing this! - David Gunning Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:00:20 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1626 I have no doubt about Garza's sincerity, and desire to make BMR a respected web site designed to help investors. However, MCLN is a bad pick, and is destined to either go bankrupt or be further painfully diluted. It will be sub-penny again in less than 20 trading days. - Robert Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:27:44 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1624 Thanks a lot for publishing my two comments (although the second one was more intended to Mr. Garza rather than the world, but that is fine). I think that speaks loudly of your willingness to be straightforward with your subscribers. One final question: any short term catalyst for MCLN that you know? Thanks a lot again and best rgds, - REB Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:19:54 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1622 I took out a subscription to BioMed Reports ($ 120.-and no refundable trial period) and was one of the first (??) to read Garza's report on MCLN. At that MCLN shares were 5.8 cents and rising fast. I bought some at 6 c. At the close MCLN had dropped back to about 3 cents. Lost half of the investment, which was a damm lot more than the $ 120 I paid for write up. Although BioMed declared that only subscribers would get the details of the MCLN recommendation, he was all over the internet (like Garza's halleluja article. Inspite of all the good news at MCLN) the stock dropped some more the next day. I know I did it all wrong,but I sure wish I had never set eyes on the BioMed recommendation. For starters, it would have saved me $ 120 for starters to qualify for being first to hear about this eh..promising investment. You live and learn... - Bogers Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:59:01 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1621 I really got caught off gaurd with this stock. I have had other stocks that have been reccomended on this site that has worked out well. I had a buy order in on mcln on monday and my account is through tdameritrade, i had the order in since market open the problem i had is my order was not filled until 10:15 i was on the ith tdameritrade trying to figure out why. The explained to me unlike regular stocks which is first come first serve, penny stocks have no rules and something really quirky was happening. While i was on the phone with tdameritrade the order finally got filled. I was in at .062 and i had made 1k, the problem is that lasted for maybe 2 minutes after it took me 45 minutes for my trade to execute. Then there was a hug dump and continues to be. Now i'm down $2575 an i'm stuck. Mike do you still feel based on technicals that the price will go to .40 cents? - roy cordero Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:08:51 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1618 For what it's worth: http://quote.barchart.com/texpert.asp?sym=MCLN&code=BSTK - M.E.Garza Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:13:27 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1615 Thank you all for your comments and support. Anyone who really knows me knows that our readers and subscribers are the most important element of our news site to me. I want to see everyone succeed and make lots of money. If it makes you feel any better, I am STILL holding a substantial number of shares in MCLN. I refuse to sell them at a discounted price. The consolidation and price action is very healthy. Next leg up is coming soon. This is a very healthy company with a great product that is much needed by their customer base. Good luck to all and never hesitate to e-mail me. - M.E.Garza Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:02:33 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1614 Let's be honest with each other folks! No one expected Garza not to be in on the action prior to the special report on Sunday...this stock moved from half a penny to 4 cents on friday - couple days before BMR article-. What pissed off a lot of people, is that the articles are published on late sundays, which allows the word to spread. You can blame it on people on message boards for sharing the news, but keep in mind one thing: If you had stocks of a company at sub-penny levels, and found out BMR was issuing a special report, would you not try to spread the word? This is inevitable. However, if these alerts are issued during the day, then members would receive an email before the word is spread, and have the upper hand. When a special report is issued 10 hours before the bell, it is not special anymore! On the other hand, if an alert is sent via email to members, we would have the advantage to buy in before others, and enjoy the benefits of being a paying member...If BMR will continue issuing special reports, they have to make sure that members benefit more from these reports than others...Otherwise, I can see many people not renewing their memberships when the time comes as a result of this wide-spread frustration... Hope Garza and others pay heed to this suggestion, and do the right thing. - cihan Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:19:18 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1611 I wonder why the company didn't buy back some of its shares when it was trading at half a cent. Should have done my own DD. - Ranadheer Kakloor Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:47:34 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1610 Very good article. Thanks for the details. Only issue is, you should not have posted the "the next Biel- like trade on tap" under the non-subscriber section on BioMed reports. Immediately the name of MCLN was all over in internet and the price got hooked up. It should have been posted only on the subscriber only section first. Also, the name of the stock should be revelaed only at 9:30 AM so that subscribers can benefit before the non subscribers. Thanks. - Dhakshinamoorthy Subramani Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:59:16 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1609 Seems like Mr Garza picks and choses the comments to be posted. That is a little bit arbitrary but consistent with the credibility of biomedreports. I had posted a comment that I would like to see posted. - dante Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:08:35 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1608 obvious pump & dump. - jeff scharff Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:31:15 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1605 Support line? People, this is a penny stock. Support is at zero. - biotrader Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:48:22 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1604 I agree with Mr. Garza. I do know technical analysis and yesterday after looking at the chart, I advised most of my members to not buy into it but put it on watchlist and wait for retracement as stock was quite high and it has gained a lot in past 30-days. As part of my investing rules, I never chase, and if I am tempted, I get my feet wet with say 10% or 20% position and then average down on every 25% drop. Lets not blame Garza, blame yourselves if you dont know when to enter. I entered BIEL at 0.008 and never complained. I entered PWRM at 0.031 and IMGG at 0.125. Sometimes things dont go as planned, this is why you buy in blocks and not in bulk. - sumesh Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:43:57 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1602 I wish these subscriber alerts were posted during market hours. premarket or post market the market makers make a killing - hal uy Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:27:23 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1600 Dear Mr. Garza, No intention of being obnoxious, I just need to understand. By the way, I am taking the time as I am a paying subscriber and I am holding some of MCLN. I thought it was a blip, but it seems that the only comments allowed in this site are the ones calling you 'brilliant', 'hero', 'maestro' and the like. It looks more Hollywood than a serious and independent research and investment site (which is what I was looking for). I think my comment was quite fair in the sense that, if you are not going to make a more transparent disclosure to your subscribers in relation to your positions and time horizon of your calls, this site does look (to any reasonable mind) like any other "pump and dump" joint. It is also difficult to believe that you will make a serious effort to bring the leaks under control when, in this situation, they are in your absolute interest (and in the detriment of your subscribers). Subscribers, like myself, who would like to believe that your research is really independent and accurate, including the time horizon related to the potential trades. May I insist that time horizons related to trades are key, as you very well know, especially if you are selling all or most of your previously acquired position immediately after you break the “news” (while suggesting it is a longer term trade). Case in point MCLN: anybody reading your piece would have had the impression that you believed it was a longer term trade on the back of ‘fundamental factors’. If you first buy, then issue a buy recommendation to your subscribers (that “mysteriously” and consistently leaks), and then sell on your own news while not disclosing that to your subscribers, it is pretty clear that your site is not different from any other “pump and dump”. Or maybe a twisted variation of the “front-running” gig, where you not only buy before your clients but also turn around and sell while pretending you are long (how much, 1 share? Or is it 2?). I repeat what I mentioned before, I really don’t care if it is right or wrong, I just think that if you want to charge a subscription, you will have to make an appropriate disclosure. The simple truth is that you cannot have it both ways, i.e., present yourself as an independent, serious and factual research and investment firm and at the same time front-run your clients and dump the stock at the same time you recommend to buy. It is either getting people to pay the subscription based on how much they value your research or screwing people for as long as they take to find out that your research is not more than another crooked operation. As I said, I am new to the site and in some respects I find it useful. I am also testing the waters in terms of the alerts and, so far, I am not impressed. This is important as I am not paying a subscription to learn, but to get information that can be monetized through trading (and I am sure that is the case for many). I am neither looking to get comments published on your site, I don’t care. If I wanted to do that I could just air my opinion in any of the free message boards available that so keenly follow your 'research' (including the leaks). My ONLY point, having paid for your service, is understanding WHICH ARE THE RULES OF THE GAME, what is the deal. A mute response would obviously point to the fact that the only rule is that you are out to screw your subscribers. I will very much appreciate an answer at your earliest convenience. You have my e-mail. Regards, - REB Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:26:06 +0100 http://www.biomedreports.com/2009120119782/part-i-one-mans-trash-is-another-mans-treasure-medclean-technologies-otcmcln.html#comment-1599 I personally believe a hero would include Q10 fine print such as: To supplement its cash resources, the Company has been pursuing a number of alternative financing arrangements with various investment entities. We are currently looking to secure additional working capital to provide the necessary funds for us to execute our business plan through various sources, including bank facilities, bridge loans and equity offerings. However, we continue to incur significant operating losses and the resultant reduction of our cash position. We cannot assure that we will be able to obtain additional funding, and the lack thereof would have a material adverse impact on our business. Moreover, any equity funding could be substantially dilutive to existing stockholders. The aforementioned factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. In the event the Company is unable to continue as a going concern it may pursue a number of different options, including, but not limited to, filing for protection under the federal bankruptcy code. - Robert Renders Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:36:30 +0100