<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>FDA Calendar Updates: ARDM, BFRM, CRTX, MDT, Zogenix</title>
		<description>Comments for FDA Calendar Updates: ARDM, BFRM, CRTX, MDT, Zogenix at http://www.biomedreports.com , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.biomedreports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:46:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.biomedreports.com/200907162204/fda-calendar-updates-ardm-bfrm-crtx-mdt-zogenix.html#comment-527</link>
			<description>Why did you take it off?  Other info that is old is still included in the calendar. - Ryan Diedrich</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:26:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.biomedreports.com/200907162204/fda-calendar-updates-ardm-bfrm-crtx-mdt-zogenix.html#comment-510</link>
			<description>this comment on HEB. I never see you guys mention it. I have heard the longer it takes, the better the chances, but this is getting ridiculous. What can possibly be taking this long, especially when the fda contacted them last year and said they did not have to call them with any more trial results - david snarski</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:15:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.biomedreports.com/200907162204/fda-calendar-updates-ardm-bfrm-crtx-mdt-zogenix.html#comment-509</link>
			<description>It was included in the FDA Calendar until the decision was announced today. Others were able to find it and have emailed me and posted about the entry on Aradigm's Yahoo! Finance message board. - Mike Havrilla</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:13:16 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.biomedreports.com/200907162204/fda-calendar-updates-ardm-bfrm-crtx-mdt-zogenix.html#comment-505</link>
			<description>Too bad ARDM was NOT on the &quot;FDA Calendar!&quot; - Ryan Diedrich</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:57:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.biomedreports.com/200907162204/fda-calendar-updates-ardm-bfrm-crtx-mdt-zogenix.html#comment-502</link>
			<description>Maybe you guys could contact Hemispherx or something.  They have left investors hanging for the last two weeks (or even 2 months).  Monday marks the two month delay...  Maybe Hemispherx should, if they haven't already, contact the FDA.  A timeline is necessary.  One cannot just allow someone to set a date, break it, make a new promise and never follow through.  Some say that contacting the FDA would be of no help to Hemispherx.  But it has been two months and the FDA has not responded yet.  How long can one hold that viewpoint?  Let's say another month passes, then another, and maybe even a year... Should Hemispherx still not contact the FDA with questions??? - Peter</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:42:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.biomedreports.com/200907162204/fda-calendar-updates-ardm-bfrm-crtx-mdt-zogenix.html#comment-500</link>
			<description>Maybe you guys could contact Hemispherx or something.  They have left investors hanging for the last two weeks (or even 2 months).  Monday marks the two month delay...  Maybe Hemispherx should, if they haven't already, contact the FDA.  A timeline is necessary.  One cannot just allow someone to set a date, break it, make a new promise and never follow through.  Some say that contacting the FDA would be of no help to Hemispherx.  But it has been two months and the FDA has not responded yet.  How long can one hold that viewpoint?  Let's say another month passes, then another, and maybe even a year... Should Hemispherx still not contact the FDA with questions??? - Yellowshoes</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:38:49 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

