<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Clinuvel Pharma (CUV.AX) (CLVLY.PK): Corporate Interview</title>
		<description>Comments for Clinuvel Pharma (CUV.AX) (CLVLY.PK): Corporate Interview at http://www.biomedreports.com , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.biomedreports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:04:56 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.biomedreports.com/200908246695/clinuvel-pharma-cuvax-clvlypk-corporate-interview.html#comment-694</link>
			<description>Greetings Mike Rabe,

Excellent question about the topical administration method and what happened with the London trial. This has been a question that many have had for some time and the whole thing is definitely a bit of an enigma. It seems that either the early results of their testing was a complete washout or it worked too well and they decided to slow things down a bit. If only Clinuvel would give a straight answer about this. News about strong efficacy of a Transdermal Technologies based lotion version would be a big boon for the value of Clinuvel!

Cheers,
[url=http://melanotan.org/]melanotan - afamelanotide[/url] - melanotan - afamelanotide</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:35:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

